Features August 2019 Issue
Reading the Fine Print
Approach charts are full of notes, symbols, and limitations that we must understand and follow. Going beneath the covers of all of that fine print can make us all better pilots.
Recently, we heard from a reader with a question about an approach into Carlisle, Pennsylvania (N94). The RNAV (GPS)-A approach has a final approach course thatís offset from the runway by around 12 degrees and a standard three-degree descent angle. Approaches are usually published with only circling minimums when the final approach course alignment relative to the runway exceeds 30 degrees (for most procedure types) or the descent angle is greater than 3.77 degrees (for Category C and below). Since neither of these reasons apply to this approach, why doesnít it have straight-in minimums?